The EdTech Roundup
Connect:
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Editorials & Press
  • Ed Tech Sites
  • Lesson Plans
    • Elementary
    • Secondary
  • Former Weekly Podcast
  • About Me
  • Contact

Guest Post | Is Virtual Reality (VR) a reality in the classroom?

12/19/2019

8 Comments

 
Picture
Google has recently announced it is scrapping its VR projects leaving educators questioning the place of this technology in the learning environment.

​Here, virtual reality (VR) expert and regular conference presenter around the world,
Kai Liang unravels the findings of this news report and sheds light on the reality of virtual reality! 


The education sector has often been the early adopter of new and emerging technologies; it is always actively searching for better educational resources to enhance the outcomes of education, and in recent years virtual reality technology has been used by an increasing number of schools across the world.
 
Let’s start by defining virtual reality (VR) which is an artificial environment that is created with software and presented to the user, typically through a VR headset; the user suspends belief and accepts it as a real environment.  In the education sector popular VR headsets include those from ClassVR or RedBoxVR. VR is often confused with augmented reality (AR) which is the technology that adds a layer of computer created content on top of real-life images to enable user interaction, for example apps on touchscreen mobile devices.
 
Proponents of VR believe that it is an excellent educational tool, which helps to improve performance and conceptual understanding on a specific range of tasks. It is, of course, particularly beneficial in allowing students to play a more active role in learning by exploring and manipulating three-dimensional, interactive environments that create a feeling of ‘being there’; especially beneficial for concepts that can’t be ‘seen’.  Taking chemistry as an example of one curriculum area, rather than trying to understand atoms and molecules from a textbook, using VR, students can ‘fly’ inside various molecules, making invisible atomic and molecular chemistry concepts visible, interactive, and experienced on a human scale.
 
As all teachers know, science education is all about ‘hands-on’ experiences and real-world exploration from which solid foundation for learning or pattern finding is achieved; VR experiences offer incredible value in bringing hard to reach areas of the curriculum to life.
 
VR in learning somewhat goes against the modern idealism of education; it’s anti-social, with students operating in isolation. However, there is no other more powerful way for students to ‘see’ and experience such concepts from such an incredibly ‘real’ perspective. And while there is no communication when they have the headsets on, once they take them off, you will have never seen such a level of passionate communication amongst even the quietest of students!
 
And certainly, VR applications are evolving at an incredibly fast rate with many of the technology giants including Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Samsung, Huawei, Lenovo, Tencent, Baidu, Xiaomi and Alibaba investing heavily in VR hardware and content. Of course, while the hardware headsets are important, the quality of the content is the real king! Google Expeditions, zSpace, Lifeliqe and my personal favorite MEL Science are examples of high-quality content providers. MEL Science’s strength is based on it starting out as a science education company, not a VR developer. Its shift towards VR content animating hundreds of chemical reactions has been driven purely by the learning benefits; driven by children, experiencing the excitement of hundreds of chemical reactions. It’s not about VR it’s about using the technology for education to enable students to interact with relevant but otherwise invisible micro-level processes; for me, this is the right way to approach VR content development.
 
I am lucky enough to be leading or playing an active part in the majority of EdTech developments in China, Australia, Romania, UK, South East Asia and soon India and Middle East. In China, the government is committed to VR in education, and its education sector expenditure on technologies including VR grows around eight per cent year on year. With all this in mind, I was interested in finding out more about Google’s perceived move away from VR hardware production. Of course, as with many news items, the headline doesn’t tell the full story.
 
At first glance, the headline suggests its move away from VR is because it doesn’t believe in the benefits of the technology. However, when you read further, Google has actually started open sourcing its VR content.
 
Google’s decision to move away from VR hardware development is something I have been aware of for a long time; it was not based on its lack of belief in the power of VR in education. Google stopped supporting Daydream technologies, because it doesn’t see a future for smartphone-based VR in a box, and I agree with that. VR on mobile phones is clearly not the best way of experiencing the content right now. The second reason for its decision is because it doesn’t yet see VR education as having a mass market; sadly, this is based on an aged old problem that we see too often in education; it’s not a big enough audience to attract these big multi-national giants. Google is one of the most powerful technology providers of mobile phones, thus expecting the sales for any of its products to be in the millions. The current uptake of VR in schools is gaining good speed, but this is simply NOT comparable to the quantity of business Google expects in the consumer space.
 
The changing face of VR supply

So, where does this leave schools who do appreciate the value of VR in the classroom?
 
When I started out in the VR space, there were more than a hundred VR content developers in China. Looking only at sales from the mass market, these companies were trying to be everything for everyone. Unsurprisingly, today, this has thinned down to leave only a few of the highest quality providers across the world; those who are fully committed to supporting the education sector. As the appreciation of the power of VR starts to spread around the education sector, and more schools commit to the technology, we will see these high quality EdTech developers grow further, increasing the quality and diversity of their learning content. The future is bright!
 
VR maturity
​

Google’s announcement unpinned the growing realization that for major EdTech corporations, it’s hard to produce high quality educational VR resources; the education market is just not big enough for them. But for those companies who understand the sector’s curriculum aligned needs and who are committed to the power of learning through VR, significant opportunities are there. As the market matures, we are seeing the good ones thrive with reduced prices. The education content providers that are surviving are those who are carefully matching the content to the curriculum; in effect the market has created its own natural filter of quality.
 
While the initial perception of VR in schools may be that it’s too expensive, there are now plenty of very affordable options.
 
At an entry level schools can actually make VR headsets very easily out of cardboard! One step up from this is DIY kits that produce a plastic headset; a slightly better VR experience for around $25. Taking another step up in terms of cost and quality comes manufactured headsets such as Oculus Go’s at around $199.
 
In September 2019, Huawei announced its new super light and relatively cheap VR Glass headset that can be connected to a smartphone through a special high-speed cable. Its expectation is to sell millions of these which is set to ignite the market; good news for the quality content providers in education.
 
Similarly, in 2019 Oculus bought out its new 6DOF headset the Oculus Quest. In my opinion this is the first device to have a high enough quality, at an affordable enough price, to really unlock the opportunity for VR. It enables full engagement and a meaningful impact across all areas of the curriculum.
 
When we look at the growing maturity of VR technology, it’s interesting to note that there are now ten universities in the UK offering a degree course in VR; something that was unheard of a few years ago. So, whether you use VR because of its incredible power to let students experience invisible concepts, or because they will undoubtedly be using the technology in their future lives, VR is here to stay.
 
It’s easy to talk negatively about any new technology. During times of constrained budgets, investing in a new teaching resource, can be daunting but from my experience, now is the time to start integrating this into your curriculum and building the VR presence in your school.

About the Author
Picture
After years of leading various projects in the field of glasses free 3D, Kai Liang’s career evolved into an early solution builder and promoter of virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR) and mixed reality (MR) within the education and training sectors. Kai has partnered with some of the most innovative and proactive organisations in the world of VR to combine solutions to make a difference in schools and colleges. His VR work has taken him to China, Australia, Romania, UK, France, Germany, South East Asia and soon India and the Middle East where he has supported organisations and presented at many international conferences. 

8 Comments
Daniel
12/20/2019 11:11:38 am

Thanks for the insights into Google's decision. Makes more sense now.

However I would like to question one comment you make: "
VR in learning somewhat goes against the modern idealism of education; it’s anti-social, with students operating in isolation. However, there is no other more powerful way for students to ‘see’ and experience such concepts from such an incredibly ‘real’ perspective. And while there is no communication when they have the headsets on, once they take them off, you will have never seen such a level of passionate communication amongst even the quietest of students!"

Actually, there is a growing trend of social and multi, user experiences, platforms events and content emerging in VR now. VR isn't anti-social anymore.

If you're interested check out www.educatorsinVR.com

Reply
Kai Liang link
12/21/2019 11:02:28 am

Hi Daniel,

I definitely agree with you on the trend to make learning in VR more sociable. My friend David Whelan of Immersive VR Education also created a platform to address that. Your example of Altspace VR is certainly one of the most famous VR social platform. I made the statement because so far all the school-based installation I have witness so far of reasonable size and popularity are still VR education solutions based on focused individual learning, with very occasional need to screencasting. It is really interesting that while the developing MR and AR classroom education solutions and its continue drop in pricing would gradually make stronger entry to school classroom with more "social" features, we are all watching the slow but somewhat certain trend of VR Social (or XR Social) platforms fundamentally change our way of social, work and education, as well as spectacularly reducing traffic jams. It might happen faster than most believe as VR and XR can do a LOT more than Video conferencing.

Reply
Zabeel International link
12/27/2019 03:35:58 am

Very useful article and predictive classroom technology, VR,AR and MR technology will make real experience and students can easily understand the topics and this technology will help them to achieve new digital era.. zabeel motivate to implement this kind of technology in education sectors.

Reply
Kai Liang link
12/30/2019 03:29:09 am

Many thanks for your kind work Zabeel - and I fully agree with you on the benefit of this technology. Trust me the benefits far outweight the reasonable cost, especially nowadays.

Reply
smith wills link
1/8/2020 09:44:58 pm

thanks for this informative post, it cleared all my doubts regarding how VR will actually work in education field.

Reply
Kai Liang
1/27/2020 10:48:22 am

I am glad this helps Smith. Please do get in touch if you have some other questions regarding VR education in general.

Reply
Kaitlyn Eliason
1/20/2020 07:18:16 pm

I find the concept of VR in a classroom to be, yes enlightening, but no, I wouldn't recommend a whole lot of it. It will take students away from the classmates in my opinion and push them further into the world of virtual-ness.

Reply
Kai Liang link
1/27/2020 10:51:07 am

Hi Kaitlyn,

I understand your concern. Actually this is really NOT an issue at all. Most of the VR education contents I know only play for 3-5 minutes at most. The actual VR focus students attention for a short time, as managed by teacher, to address specific part of teaching only. It would be always followed up by class or peer discussions on the findings. I hope that makes you feel better.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Editorials

    Here you can find the Round Up's collection of editorial pieces and press releases where we will discuss the latest trends and ideas in educational technology


    Picture

    Featured

    Picture
    Check out our featured review | ClassroomAPP: A Complete, K-12 Digital Platform for Online and In-Person Classrooms

    Teach.com

    Connect


    Awards

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013

           
​Except where noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
Picture

Copyright 2020 | Mike Karlin, Ph.D.